Paying Very Little Would Say A lot
“The Great Replacement” is a racist theory about the transformation of America. It proposes that immigration will replace the whiteness of America. There is nothing about the American enterprise which is inherently “white,” though, which makes the theory dumb on its face. Since Twitter has become a cesspool of white supremacist garbage, I think it is appropriate to turn their theory on its head.
On top of that, it makes unfounded claims and is generally disreputable. However, it’s a phrase that makes sense when it comes to destroying the nasty predominance of certain things: like Twitter. For too long, platforms like Twitter have overshadowed us, making us believe they represent the pinnacle of online discourse. They donβt. In fact, their monopolistic grip on what we believe to be ‘the town square’ has stifled creativity, suppressed smaller voices, and turned speech into a commodity sold to the highest bidder.
But what if we could replace Twitterβnot with another ‘free speech’ platform, but with something better? Something simpler. Enter ‘2 Cents,’ the platform built on cheap speech, equal access, and a vision for a fairer digital landscape.
Gone are the days of follower counts dictating worth, algorithms shaping our every click, and advertisers paying to bury dissent. Itβs time to reimagine platforms like Twitter and build ones that empower real conversations instead of exploiting them.
‘2 Cents’ – A New Kind of Social Media App
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/690ff/690ffb4d573f1516d7f236800095a6fbe0d787c0" alt=""
I am conceiving this as a hypothetical, but very real potential business. At its core, 2 Cents is a pay-to-publish platform, but donβt let that scare youβitβs affordable, transparent, and refreshingly straightforward. For just 2 cents per day, users can publish their thoughts and ideas. And if you donβt feel like posting one day? You donβt pay. This simple model ensures users have skin in the game, without breaking the bank.
- The Cost: Users pay only on days they publish, with a maximum cost of $7.30 per year. News agencies and professional users pay more to reflect their profit-driven use of the platform.
- Equal Opportunity to Go Viral: Thereβs no pay-to-play system. Whether you have 5 readers or 5 million, the content that resonates rises to the topβpurely on merit, not ad dollars.
- Ad Model: Ads are simple, static, and sidebar-only. No creepy tracking pixels or algorithmic targeting. Just ‘dumb ads’ that get the job done.
- Affiliate Revenue Transparency: Brands benefit from clear attribution when users click on their ads, and the platform takes a small affiliate commission.
You Must Have Skin in the Game To Give Your Speech Value
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/228c8/228c81ccb831d0ed5f75b25915afbea1162197ae" alt=""
Letβs be clear: 2 Cents is a fictional concept. It doesnβt existβyet. If investors join me, or if enough people support my work by purchasing merchandise, Iβll gladly bring it to life. Until then, it remains an ideaβa thought experiment reimagining how social platforms could prioritize fairness and accountability over profit and control.
This isnβt about replacing free speech. Free speech is a constitutional right, protected from government interference. However, platforms that facilitate speech still incur costs to operate. 2 Cents doesnβt aim to replace free speech; it offers a model for more intentional engagementβa system where every voice holds value because every user contributes, even in small ways.
The inspiration for this idea is personal. Iβve scraped change off the pavement to eat, and yet I still spent time on social media platforms fighting to be heard. Back then, I didnβt pay the platforms a dime, but I poured my time and energy into engaging, advocating, and making my voice known. Thatβs the paradox of platforms like X (formerly Twitter): while they market themselves as ‘free,’ theyβre far from fair. Algorithms, ad dollars, and influence determine who gets heard and who gets buried.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5281/d5281941c6e7483a8baae492bbaa4addee98ea54" alt=""
With 2 Cents, the model flips: every user invests a tiny amountβjust 2 cents per dayβto publish their voice. Thatβs it. The cost isnβt designed to exclude; itβs designed to give people a stake in the conversation. When you pay to speak, even a negligible amount, you care a little more about what youβre saying and how it contributes to the greater dialogue. And when every voice has the same opportunity to be heard, real conversations can emerge, free from the distortions of moneyed interests and algorithmic meddling.
Why This Model Works Better Than X (Formerly Twitter)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/842c5/842c51f74f95510f7fb0ae513fa69f94da5ae176" alt=""
This model also avoids the failures of platforms like X, which claimed to champion free speech but ultimately became echo chambers for the loudest and wealthiest. Instead, 2 Cents reimagines speech as a space where everyone has equal footingβwhere ideas gain traction because they resonate, not because theyβre backed by funding.
Iβm not saying 2 Cents is a guaranteed solution, but itβs an idea worth exploring. And if this concept ever became real, it would be built on the principles of transparency, equity, and accessibility. A place where even someone scraping change off the pavement can find their voice and be heard.
How ‘2 Cents’ Redefines Social Media Dynamics
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b437e/b437e64d54b80b5da91645f59ae33fa7fc8948c4" alt=""
2 Cents doesnβt just tweak the social media playbookβit rewrites it entirely.
- No Special Status for Government or Corporations
Government officials, agencies, and corporations are treated as equals to everyday users. No special privileges. No blue checkmark hierarchies. Itβs a true level playing field where ideas, not influence, matter. - No Followers, Just Check-Ins
Instead of amassing followers like trophies, users curate check-in lists for the accounts they want to monitor. Think of it as a bookmark for conversations you care about, not a popularity contest. - Mute and Block Without Algorithmic Punishment
Users can mute or block accounts for their personal experience, but it wonβt harm the visibility of those accounts overall. Speech remains equal, even when someone doesnβt want to hear it.
This model strips away the gimmicks of virality and forces real populism to emerge. Celebrities canβt game the system, and advertisers canβt control the narrative. What you see is what you getβa genuine marketplace of ideas.
Why ‘Cheap Speech’ Matters
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fc81/8fc813f5023c9dd5632b4592486cbd9eeed916f6" alt=""
Platforms like Twitter have convinced us theyβre indispensableβthat theyβre the only place where discourse can thrive. But their reliance on ad dollars and algorithmic manipulation has turned them into platforms of suppression, not expression.
2 Cents rejects the premise that social media needs to be free to be accessible. By embracing a modest pay-to-publish model, it removes the hidden costs of surveillance capitalism, returning value to the users instead of advertisers.
Unlike platforms that brand themselves as ‘free speech havens’ while quietly suppressing dissent, 2 Cents takes a different approach. Itβs not a free speech platform; itβs a cheap speech platform. And in this case, cheap is better.
Invest With Me To Build 2cents & The Great Replacement of Twitter
The time has come to dislodge the false monopoly of platforms like Twitter and reimagine what digital discourse could be. 2 Cents is just one example of how we might achieve thisβby embracing a model that prioritizes fairness, simplicity, and the voices of the many over the dollars of the few.
Whether or not such a platform becomes reality, the idea challenges us to rethink and reject what we view as inevitable in social media. We do not have to accept Twitter’s monopoly, whether real or perceived, as unchangeable.
Itβs time we gave our two cents on how to break it.